I never argued that it was as, or more, significant - only that it was significant, period. Many are arguing that it is not significant at all, and to them, I ask, why not? It shows promise, possibility, and hope - many of the things needed to do better and continue winning. Sure, luck may be a factor, but you have to remember - it goes both ways…
As far as skill goes, it’s the very fact that we can’t readily define it that prevents us from being able to measure it effectively. It’s not measurable, because it’s not static; it’s fluid. Therefore, the only way were can measure it is by setting our own limitations…